Prophecies bug the crap outta me.
Prophecy
is religious rhetoric. It attempts to create a situation where people can only
react in limited ways. Thus the prophecy of Judgement Day: it's coming soon and
only the worthy will be able to enter Heaven—so you damn-well
better be worthy.
In a book with prophecy,
even if the character struggles to avoid their destiny, they are only going to
bring it about all the sooner. There is no lesson or growth because there was
no other way that the story could have happened. Thus Oedipus will return to Thebes having killed
his father and will take his mother, the queen, to wife. So also does Shere Khan, the Tiger, hate humans and seek out Mowgli
because he fears he will one-day die at human hands. And, all for a prophecy, Garion treks across the world to fight men he has never
met because of an age-old battle that he should have no reason to care about.
Prophecy avoids the need for human motivations: at its best it is pointless, at its worst it is lazy.
This being
said, chaos theory is an area of prophecy that doesn’t
have so much of a ‘nails on a chalkboard’ effect. Scientific prediction, in
this day and age, is infinitely less painful to believe. Obviously I don't
expect this argument to hold up in a strict debate, chaos theory is a
hypothetical concept that can only be effectively calculated in retrospect—like prophecy.
Right
then.
Cat Karina is a story told in the
shadow of an intergalactic and immensely knowledgeable entity called Starquin. We don't meet him, but his presence is the reason for the story. This entity has found himself trapped in Earth's galactic sector and in order
for Starquin to escape the tiny universe, one person must make three important choices that
will set one of her descendants on a path to aid Starquin's release.
The sci-fi
novel is set within a posthuman society in Earth's post-apocalyptia. Humanity on Earth is still
attempting to resurrect itself from the detritus of a series of catastrophic
mistakes that have brought technology down to a primitive level. The various humanoid races that inhabit Earth are kept in check by a religion that
preaches cooperation with nature rather than the domination of it. Meat-eating is
frowned upon, fire is avoided (even for cooking), and the ‘working of metal’ is
seen as evil.
The book
opens at a period of transition in this peaceful society. Despite the taboo,
humans are once more beginning to work metal and use fire and the day is coming
when people will once more begin to deliberately kill each other.
The story
begins with the protagonist, Karina, lying trapped on a wooden train
track, soon to die when the train hits. She is met by an emissary of
Starquin, who saves her life in exchange for her oath to obey Starquin's orders.
Karina is
descended from a race of humans who were genetically spliced with
leopard genes. The ‘felinos’, as they are called, are a volatile, attractive and extremely vicious race loosely based on the cultures of Latin America. True
Humans are still the dominant race on Earth, but there are a lot of other humanoids
of the 'specialist' races, including crocodile folk, monkey folk and bear folk.
The
story’s prophetic premise perhaps works because Karina is exactly the type of
person you don’t get in prophecy books. She doesn’t agonise about her promise
to Starquin or worry about her future, sometimes she doesn’t even believe that
Starquin exists. She is a slave to instinct and acts without thinking about the
consequences. Most of the time she forgets about her promise completely. This
way the prophecy is only incidental to her life, not the reason for it.
One thing
that truly struck me about Cat Karina is Coney's use of a religion that
completely forbids the social and technological advancements that humanity has
always moved towards. The humans and their client races are meat eaters denied
meat, they are territorial creatures forbidden from war and they are
technologically dependent yet they cannot use materials other than
wood and stone. Despite
the hundreds of years that these humans have spent, desperately clinging to the ideal
of a cooperative and nonviolent society, they have not been able to relinquish their violent and competitive instincts. The book illustrates, in evocative and vivid
words, that despite our advancements and concern with technology, philosophy
and religion, humans are still as animalistic as we always were.